General Counsel

Jun 13, 2025

6 min. read

How vulnerability scanning supports DORA compliance

Share:

How vulnerability scanning supports DORA compliance

When the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) came into force, it sent a clear message: operational resilience isn’t just about disaster recovery—it’s about cyber hygiene, continuity, and proactive defence. Among its many moving parts, one principle stands out for its sheer practicality and power: knowing your vulnerabilities before attackers do. That’s exactly where vulnerability scanning becomes a critical compliance ally.

DORA applies to a wide array of financial entities and ICT third-party providers, setting rigorous expectations for risk management, monitoring, and threat-led testing. While it doesn’t name specific tools, it lays down a framework that makes regular, intelligent vulnerability scanning not just helpful—but essential.

Mapping scanning to DORA’s risk management obligations

DORA’s Title II focuses on ICT risk management, requiring entities to identify, protect, detect, respond to, and recover from ICT-related incidents. Vulnerability scanning aligns naturally with the first three of those pillars.

Let’s examine the alignment in clearer operational terms:

DORA RequirementScanning’s Contribution
Identify ICT risksFinds known software and configuration vulnerabilities in real-time
Protect against cyber threatsSupports prioritised patching and configuration hardening
Detect anomalies and weaknessesEnables continuous monitoring of IT assets for emerging threats
Respond to vulnerabilitiesProvides structured inputs for incident workflows and remediation timelines
Recover from incidentsHelps assess exposure and harden systems against repeat compromise
How vulnerability scanning supports DORA’s risk management pillars

Because DORA demands that financial entities maintain a “sound, comprehensive and well-documented ICT risk management framework,” vulnerability scanning provides not just operational support, but also documentary evidence. It helps organisations prove that they are proactively detecting and mitigating ICT risks—not simply reacting.

A cornerstone of continuous monitoring

One of the most emphasized tenets in DORA is the concept of continuous risk monitoring. This is a marked shift from point-in-time assessments to a more dynamic, ongoing evaluation of digital exposure. Vulnerability scanning—especially when scheduled regularly or integrated into CI/CD pipelines—meets this expectation head-on.

The relevant wording in Article 6.4(b) makes this link explicit. Entities must deploy tools that allow them to “identify all sources of ICT risk in a timely manner.” Scanners that are continuously updated with CVE feeds or threat intelligence platforms deliver on this need.

Let’s compare traditional vs DORA-aligned scanning approaches:

CharacteristicTraditional ScanningDORA-Aligned Scanning
FrequencyMonthly or quarterlyContinuous or high-frequency scheduling
ScopeLimited to perimeterIncludes cloud, endpoints, third-party systems
PrioritisationManual or static severity ratingsIntegrated with asset criticality and threat data
IntegrationStandalone reportsFeeds into risk management platforms or SIEM
Traditional vs DORA-aligned vulnerability scanning

This evolution is not just a technical preference—it reflects regulatory momentum. As DORA raises the bar on what “resilience” means, outdated scanning practices quickly fall out of step.

Supporting DORA’s advanced testing framework

DORA also introduces Threat-Led Penetration Testing (TLPT) under Title V. While this form of red-teaming is distinct from vulnerability scanning, the two are complementary. Scanning helps organisations prepare for TLPT by preemptively identifying and addressing weaknesses that testers would otherwise exploit.

Scanning becomes a form of readiness assessment—ensuring that environments aren’t littered with low-hanging fruit. This not only improves security posture but can also streamline TLPT scoping and reduce exposure during the testing period.

Here’s how the two methods compare and collaborate:

FeatureVulnerability ScanningTLPT (DORA-guided)
PurposeIdentify known weaknessesSimulate realistic, adversary-driven attack paths
FrequencyContinuous or scheduledEvery 3–5 years (minimum, per DORA)
ScopeEntire infrastructure (based on IP/assets)Pre-defined critical systems
OutputTechnical findings with severity ratingsTactical findings with recommendations
RelationshipPrepares the environment and reduces attack surfaceValidates detection and response capabilities
Vulnerability scanning vs threat-led penetration testing (TLPT)

By removing known vulnerabilities in advance, scanning ensures that TLPT efforts focus on high-value insights rather than avoidable technical debt.

Evidence generation for compliance audits

A key aspect of DORA is auditability—the ability to demonstrate that controls are both implemented and effective. Vulnerability scan reports are ideally suited for this, offering a timestamped, repeatable snapshot of the entity’s exposure at any given point.

Scan data can support compliance with Article 6.9, which requires documentation of all “risk analysis and assessment procedures.” When fed into a risk register or GRC platform, scan outputs can show that vulnerabilities were:

  • Detected in a timely fashion
  • Classified by severity and business impact
  • Assigned for remediation
  • Tracked through closure

Because many scanning tools integrate with ITSM and SIEM platforms, the remediation workflow becomes traceable—just the kind of governance DORA auditors will look for.

Operationalise DORA compliance with CyberUpgrade vulnerability scanning

DORA doesn’t just raise the cybersecurity bar—it redefines how financial entities should approach risk. At CyberUpgrade, we help you turn regulatory expectations into real-time resilience. Our managed vulnerability scanning service aligns directly with DORA’s ICT risk management mandates, providing you with continuous visibility across your infrastructure—from cloud environments to third-party integrations. Our CISOs run the scan for you and map the scan findings to business-critical systems, prioritise by impact, and deliver audit-ready reports that feed straight into your risk register.

Whether you’re preparing for TLPT, building out your ICT risk framework, or proving control effectiveness to auditors, we provide the technical evidence and expert support you need—on schedule, in scope, and fully documented.

Stay ahead of DORA, not buried under it. Let CyberUpgrade help you transform scanning into a strategic asset. Talk to us today.

Beyond compliance: building resilience through visibility

DORA’s aim is not to increase paperwork. It’s to elevate operational resilience across the financial sector. Vulnerability scanning contributes by offering organisations clear, actionable visibility into their digital exposure. More importantly, it embeds that visibility into the day-to-day rhythm of ICT operations.

Scanning answers a deceptively simple question: What risks do we already have in the open? That clarity can be uncomfortable, but it’s what resilience is built on.

For entities subject to DORA, the question isn’t whether to scan—it’s how well those scans are integrated, prioritised, and acted upon. When done right, scanning becomes a quiet force multiplier: enabling early detection, supporting informed risk decisions, and turning compliance into capability.

Automate Your Cybersecurity and Compliance

It's like an in-house cybersecurity & compliance team for a monthly subscription! No prior cybersecurity or compliance experience needed.

Share this article

Post on Linkedin
Post on Facebook
Post on X

How useful was this post?

0 / 5. 0

General Counsel

He is regulatory compliance strategist with over a decade of experience guiding fintech and financial services firms through complex EU legislation. He specializes in operational resilience, cybersecurity frameworks, and third-party risk management. Nojus writes about emerging compliance trends and helps companies turn regulatory challenges into strategic advantages.
  • DORA compliance
  • EU regulations
  • Cybersecurity risk management
  • Non-compliance penalties
  • Third-party risk oversight
  • Incident reporting requirements
  • Financial services compliance

Explore further